Letters to the Editor: Postponing drops is our best defense against wildfires. Reducing it would be disastrous

FILE – An aircraft drops a delay agent on a wildfire near homes on Thursday, February 10, 2022 in Laguna Beach, California. U.S. officials are testing a new wildfire fighting agent after two decades of buying millions of gallons annually from a supplier, but watchdogs say the expensive strategy is too fixated on airstrikes at the cost of hiring more firefighters on the ground. (AP Photo/Ringo HW Chiu, file)
(Ringo HW Chiu/Associated Press)

Postponing drops is our best defense against wildfires. Reducing it would be disastrous

letters to the editor

April 10, 2023

About the publisher: For nearly half a century I have led suppression efforts at many of the state’s largest wildfires, and few resources have proven more effective in saving lives, communities and ecosystems than suppressing fire from the air. (“Fire-retardant airborne droplets attacked as ineffective and polluting,” March 29)

There are countless examples (and plenty of data) to confirm this truth, but none are more poignant than the air-retardant droplets dropped by the Quick Reaction Force (QRF) during the Los Angeles County Route Fire last year.

QRF, a unique partnership between fire departments and Southern California’s Edison, is the world’s only fleet of nighttime firefighting helicopters. A recent cost-benefit analysis focused on the Route Fire suggests it saved lives, communities and millions of taxpayer dollars.

As wildfires become more common, firefighting has never been more important and there is no replacement, water, fuel cuts or ground crew. Banning their use would harm forest conservation, threaten endangered species and limit our ability to save lives.

Brian Fennessy, Irvine Author is Chief of the Orange County Fire Department.

Source: LA Times

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

spot_imgspot_img

Hot Topics

Related Articles