Chamber fiercely on the toilet questioned Supplement each other Related articles

During the debate over the tax surcharge scandal, Prime Minister Mark Rutte again asked victims to be patient in dealing with their damages. Opposition lawmakers vehemently denounced the prime minister. They have also expressed fears of a recidivism: the benefit system is far from gone.

SP Member of Parliament Leijten comforts parents on allowances issue in House of Representatives during a debate on allowances affair. The entire opposition wanted Rutte to join the debate. The childcare allowance scandal, in which tens of thousands of parents were affected by a crazed approach to scamming and hoovering, led to the fall of the previous cabinet in early 2021. (ANP / ANP / Robin Utrecht)

Another stumbling block the House stumbles over is that new documents keep emerging showing that the government could have intervened much sooner. Already three times in six months documents have emerged that have not been shared with the parliamentary commission of inquiry.

Billions of documents

Prime Minister Rutte defended himself by emphasizing the large amount of documents. ‘There are 25 million records on the Employment and Social Affairs Network Units. Finance involves 19 million documents and tax and customs administration, including allowances, involves 4 billion documents spread across 9,000 servers and over 100,000 cooperation areas,” the prime minister said.

Rutte says this is by no means a valid reason the docs have gone under the table, but he does want to underscore what an “insane amount of docs” is involved. He therefore does not exclude the possibility that some things will come to light in the future. So more corpses can come out of the closet.

“We didn’t understand why the secretary of state suddenly resigned on December 18, but now we understand”

Pieter Omtzigt, Independent MP

Menno. Come down early

The independent deputy Pieter Omtzigt points to a “total bombshell” that the then state secretary Menno Snel received on his desk on December 17, 2000: an e-mail stating that the Tax and Customs Administration for Services was not complying with the law on 21 points. “We didn’t understand why he suddenly resigned on December 18, but we understand it now and we understand it three years later,” says Omtzigt.

Emotions

Prime Minister Rutte specifically addressed parents in the public gallery, some of whom reacted emotionally. However, according to political journalist Mats Akkermans, the prime minister was not really in danger during the debate. ‘Some parties, such as SP, DENK and MP Pieter Omtzigt are completely done with Prime Minister Mark Rutte. They are fed up. But there are also parties that say: this is why an entire government has already resigned. What does it add if another cabinet resigns two and a half years later over the same story?’

Author: Mark VanHarreveld
Source: BNR

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

spot_imgspot_img

Hot Topics

Related Articles