Categories: Politics

Chamber regrets the “politicized” discussion of Arib; the search continues. Related articles

The House of Representatives is not satisfied with the way the inquiry into allegations of social insecurity in the House of Representatives, caused or not by former President Khadija Arib, has been handled. Almost all political groups said it is a pity that so much political debate has arisen.

The issue was also debated in parliament on Tuesday. Then it turned out that the Speaker of the House Vera Bergkamp has enough support to continue the announced fact-finding investigation into the allegations. On Wednesday it was discussed in more detail in a special parliamentary committee that deals with the functioning of parliament.

The House of Representatives is not satisfied with the way the inquiry into allegations of social insecurity in the House of Representatives, caused or not by former President Khadija Arib, has been handled. (ANP SEM VAN DER WAL)

Without House of Representatives officials, “we can’t do our job,” said Laura Bromet of GroenLinks. Almost all the other MPs agreed with her words. “It is they who enable us to have a functioning parliamentary democracy,” says Stephan van Baarle of DENK.

Almost all of the MPs present also expressed their regret that the investigation was “made politically”. Normally, these kinds of topics must be discussed in the council of the Chamber (the presidium), behind closed doors. Now he has returned repeatedly in debates and in the media.

Van der Plas apologies

Several politicians referred to the previous meeting of the same working method committee two weeks ago. According to Speaker of the House of Representatives Bergkamp, ​​that meeting too “went beyond its limits.” Caroline van der Plas even apologized if her questions about her exacerbated feelings of insecurity among employees.

There were also MPs who wanted to continue the content of the discussion. According to Renske Leijten (SP), it is right that questions about the state of affairs are being asked because the matter was in the public eye. They wanted to know what the garrison did with reports of an unsafe working atmosphere.

The Chamber also asked for details on the research design and, in particular, whether it should be expanded. Bergkamp was not at all willing to do this, because she wants clarity quickly. More questions about the House of Representatives details will be addressed in other studies, she says.

Author: ap
Source: BNR

Share
Published by
Fernando

Recent Posts

Miss Switzerland candidate accuses Trump of sexual assault

A former Miss Switzerland candidate is accusing Donald Trump of “bumping” her at a meeting…

6 months ago

10 fun facts about Italian classics – or did they come from China?

Friday is pasta day—at least today. Because October 17th is World Pasta Day. It was…

6 months ago

Lonely Planet recommends Valais for travelers

The Lonely Planet guide recommends Valais as a tourist destination next year. The mountain canton…

6 months ago

Lonely Planet recommends Valais for travelers

The Lonely Planet guide recommends Valais as a tourist destination next year. The mountain canton…

6 months ago

Kamala Harris enters media ‘enemy territory’ – that’s what she did at Fox

Kamala Harris gave an interview to the American television channel Fox News, which was not…

6 months ago

One Direction singer Liam Payne (31) died in Buenos Aires

The British musician attended the concert of his former bandmate in Buenos Aires. The trip…

6 months ago